Long-Term Survival in Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma Can Be Achieved With “Metronomic Dosing” of Paclitaxel/Oxaliplatin/Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil (POLF) and Possibly Other
By Ben M. ChueAbstract
Background
Patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC) have a poor prognosis, with median survivals of 3 to 6 months and poor quality of life. A weekly, “metronomic dosing” of chemotherapy allows for increased dose density and dose intensity, but with good tolerability, and can have anti-angiogenic effects. The anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab blocks angiogenesis, normalizing vasculature, decreases interstitial tumor pressure, and allows for more chemotherapy to reach the tumor bed. Weekly paclitaxel may do the same, allowing for a smaller amount of chemotherapy, which causes fewer systemic side effects, to have better efficacy. We now report updated data with 30 patients with PC or CC who received at least 11 weeks of POLF chemotherapy; some patients also received paclitaxel/gemcitabine (PaG) and paclitaxel/irinotecan (PIC).
Methods
Thirty (30) patients, 35 to 81 years old, with metastatic biopsy-proven PC (n=28) or CC (n=2) were treated with weekly POLF (paclitaxel [P]: 60 mg/m2, oxaliplatin [O]: 50 mg/ m2, leucovorin [L]: 20 mg/m2, 5-FU [F]: 425 mg/m2) for at least 11 weeks, with one switched to Abraxane (protein-bound paclitaxel) because of a reaction to paclitaxel. Twenty-six (26) received at least one gemcitabine-based regimen, 14 had two or more different previous treatments. One patient (A.B.) also received intermittent cetuximab, and two patients (M.C., Ju.S.) also received erlotinib. Glutathione, calcium, and magnesium were used to prevent oxaliplatin-related neuropathy. Glutamine was taken to prevent paclitaxel-related neuropathy. Fourteen (14) patients also received at least 8 weeks of PaG (P: 60 mg/m2; G: 800–1000 mg/m2), of whom seven (7) subsequently received at least 8 weeks of PIC (P: 60 mg/m2; I: 60–100 mg/m2, with either cisplatin 20 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2, or mitomycin C 4 mg/m2).
Results
Median survivals after diagnosis and after POLF were 15.0 and 10.2 months, respectively. Survival at 12, 18, 24, and 30 months are 19 patients (63%), 12 (40%), 9 (30%) and 7 (23%). In 14 patients who also received PaG, median survival was 23.8 months (vs. 11.4 mo in 16 patients who did not receive PaG). For the 7/14 who also received PIC, 4/7 have survived more than 30 months. One patient (A.B.) was severely debilitated, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status of 4, following progression of disease after two previous lines of CT, but is living 5 years since diagnosis, with ECOG 0. Two patients (L.C., D.P.) had bilirubin level of 27 and 9.6, both of which normalized with treatment without need for stent placement. One patient had a small bowel obstruction, ECOG 4, but became unobstructed with treatment. One patient also had a concurrent primary lung cancer, atrial fibrillation, and severe emphysema. The POLF regimen was well tolerated with two grade 3 neurotoxicity, two grade 3 diarrhea, and two grade 3 nausea/vomiting.
Conclusions
Weekly metronomic dosing of POLF has excellent activity against metastatic PC/CC, even in previously treated patients, with manageable side effects. A phase II study of POLF is open to enrollment, although accrual has been slow. Weekly metronomic dosing of other chemotherapy agents, such as PaG and PIC, may also be effective, and may contribute to long-term survival for patients with this disease. A strategy of sequential metronomic chemotherapy treatments may be useful in the neoadjuvant setting for tumor shrinkage to bring more patients to surgery for potential cure, in the adjuvant setting after potential curative surgery to improve cure rates, or in the metastatic disease setting to extend survival. We encourage clinical trials to investigate these exciting possibilities.
Patient | Gender | Age | Tumor Sites | Prior Chemotherapy | CA 19-9 | Survival (Months) | Clinical Response | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before POLF | After 12 Weeks | Since Diagnosis | Since POLF Treatment | ||||||
|
|||||||||
A.B. | Male | 35 | Body of pancreas, liver | 1) Gemcitabine+ Capecitabine 2) Gemcitabine+ Docetaxel |
489 | 18 | 60.1+ | 54.0+ | PR |
C.O. | Female | 65 | Head of pancreas, liver | 1) Gemcitabine+ Cisplatin+ Erlotinib 2) S1 |
1088 | 135 | 39.6+ | 36.0+ | PR |
S.H. | Female | 65 | Head of pancreas, supraclavicular LN, lungs | 1) Paclitaxel+ Gemcitabine 2) Erlotinib |
10 | 10 | 34.6+ | 28.3+ | PR |
GL.S.# | Female | 49 | Liver, lungs, bone | 1) Capecitabine + Gemcitabine 2) Irinotecan + Gemcitabine |
54 | 17 | 34.5 | 21.4 | PD |
V.S. | Male | 65 | Head of pancreas, lungs, retroperitoneal LN | 1) Gemcitabine+ Capecitabine | 1,730 | 14 | 32.9 | 26.9 | SD |
F.T. | Female | 44 | Head of pancreas, liver | 1) Gemcitabine+ Docetaxel+ Erlotinib 2) Gemcitabine+ Capecitabine |
3378 | 326 | 32.6 | 17.9 | PR |
L.C. | Female | 43 | Neck of pancreas, lungs, retroperitoneal and supraclavicular LN. | None | 8,893 | 326 | 31.9 | 30.6 | MR/PR |
J.N. | Male | 52 | Head of pancreas, liver, lungs | 1) Gemcitabine+Mitomycin+ Capecitabine 2) Paclitaxel+Gemcitabine |
– | – | 29.5 | 24.4 | SD |
Ju.S. | Female | 69 | Tail of pancreas, liver | 1) Gemcitabine+ Docetaxel+ Capecitabine 2) Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine |
8 | – | 27.5+ | 21.9+ | PR |
I.S. | Female | 53 | Body & tail of pancreas, liver | 1) Gemcitabine 2) Capecitabine |
124,692 | 23,131 | 22.5 | 10.4 | MR/PR |
H.N. | Male | 74 | Tail of pancreas, liver | 1) Paclitaxel+ Gemcitabine | 5,320 | 11,734 | 19.3 | 6.3 | PD |
M.C. | Male | 53 | Head of pancreas, colon, mesenteric LN, liver | 1) Capecitabine+ Gemcitabine+ XRT 2) Paclitaxel+ Gemcitabine |
8 | 6 | 18.3 | 14.8 | PR |
B.P. | Male | 65 | Neck of pancreas, liver | 1) Mitomyein C+ 5-FU+ Cisplatin 2) Gemcitabine |
3,453 | 1,445 | 17.4 | 11.3 | MR |
Jo.S.# | Female | 81 | Liver, periaortic LN | 1) Gemcitabine + Paclitaxel | – | – | 17.2 | 12.0 | SD |
N.C. | Male | 71 | Head of pancreas, lungs | 1) 5-FU+XRT 2) Capecitabine 3) Gemcitabine+ Docetaxel+ Capecitabine |
393 | 2066 | 15 | 6.9 | PD |
W.S. | Male | 66 | Head of pancreas, liver, periaortic LN. | None | 112 | 66 | 15.0 | 12.3 | Mixed |
B.E. | Female | 54 | Head of pancreas, liver | 1) Docetaxel+ Gemcitabine 2) 5-FU+XRT |
92 | 47 | 13.6 | 9.9 | PR |
D.B. | Male | 75 | Head of pancreas, periaortic LN, hilar LN, bones | 1) Paclitaxel+ Gemcitabine 2) Erlotinib |
345,385 | 164,329 | 13.3 | 7.5 | MR |
D.P. | Male | 55 | Head of pancreas, liver | 1) Gemcitabine+ Cisplatin | 9,015 | 53 | 12.0 | 10.6 | PR |
T.W. | Female | 49 | Tail of pancreas, liver | 1) Paclitaxel+ Gemcitabine | 1,760 | 691 | 11.9 | 5.5 | SD |
B.M. | Female | 59 | Head and tail of pancreas, stomach, mesocolon, and liver | 1) Paclitaxel+ Gemcitabine 2) Docetaxel+ Gemcitabine |
17 | 10 | 11.5 | 6.6 | Mixed/SD |
P.L. | Female | 56 | Tail of pancreas, liver, lung | 1) Gemcitabine+ Oxaliplatin+ Erlotinib | 47,446 | 69 | 10.7 | 7.4 | PR |
K.D. | Female | 65 | Head of pancreas, liver | 1) Gemcitabine | 2,027 | 4,569 | 10.2 | 5.8 | PD |
J.C. | Male | 47 | Tail of pancreas, liver | 1) Paclitaxel+ Gemcitabine | 154 | 1,237 | 10.0 | 6.0 | SD |
G.L. | Female | 75 | Head of pancreas, liver, lung | 1) Capecitabine | 3,594 | 302 | 7.9 | 6.2 | MR |
G.B. | Male | 65 | Body of pancreas, liver | 1) Gemcitabine+ Docetaxel+ Capecitabine | 6928 | 917 | 7.9 | 5.8 | PR |
D.M. | Male | 49 | Uncinate process of pancreas, liver | 1) Docetaxel + Gemcitabine | 42,252 | 4,682 | 7.9 | 3.3 | PD |
R.R. | Male | 66 | Head of pancreas, liver | None | 3,658 | 1,136 | 7.5 | 6.7 | PR |
H.G. | Male | 73 | Head of pancreas, liver, lung | 1) 5-FU/LK 2) Gemcitabine+ Erlotinib 3) Capecitabine |
5690 | 3978 | 6.6 | 6.2 | MR |
M.L. | Male | 64 | Head of pancreas, liver, lungs | 1) Gemcitabine + Docetaxel + Capecitabine | 85 | 42 | 6.3 | 3.5 | Mixed |
Originally published on November 1, 2008, in National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, NIH.